Jira Metrics

Engineering Flow

AI-first executive view · AI teams · last 30d

AI Bottom Line

Templated

Throughput improved (+23.3%) and AI participation decreased (-2.3 pp). Not enough samples for AI/Human comparison this period (n<20 across all metrics).

AI ROI: data insufficient for the last 30d. 2 projects in scope, none with stable AI vs Human cohort (n≥10 both sides) on Lead Time.
Investigate per project →

Headline KPIs · last 30d

Issues done
53 23.3%
Last 8w
AI participation
0.0% 100.0%
Last 8w
Lead Time (active)
4.7d 27.8%
no trend
Cycle Time (active)
0h 100.0%
Last 8w

AI insight

  • Where AI helps:Not enough samples for AI/Human comparison this period (n<20 across all metrics)
  • Next focus:Reduce wait time in Waiting for Client (currently 139.8d) — this is the team-wide bottleneck.

AI in teams · 2 teams

IMC[Engineering]: Incident Management
0.0% AI

2 completed · 50.0% AI-touched · 1 active agent

Bottom line

IMC declined (-66.7%) in throughput. AI cohort too small for cycle comparison (n=0/0); no specific AI bottleneck stands out.

Issues done

2

-66.7% vs prev

AI-owned share

0%

+0.0 pp vs prev

AI-touched

1 (50%)

Lead Time (active)

29.6d

prev 20.2d

Cycle Time (active)

prev 0h

TTR p50

6.4h

prev 4.8d

PR Review p50

WIP active

2

WIP blocked

0

AI insight

Where AI helps

No AI-owned metric is currently faster than the human cohort.

Where AI hurts

No AI-owned metric is currently slower than the human cohort.

AI cohort too small for direct comparison on this team.

Top AI bottleneck

no AI-owned cohort with stage data

Active agents · top 1

Oliver
29
ADSAdvertisement
0.0% AI

52 completed · 13.5% AI-touched · 2 active agents

Bottom line

ADS improved (33.3%) in throughput. AI cohort too small for cycle comparison (n=0/52); no specific AI bottleneck stands out.

Issues done

52

+33.3% vs prev

AI-owned share

0%

-2.6 pp vs prev

AI-touched

7 (14%)

Lead Time (active)

4.7d

prev 6.5d

Cycle Time (active)

0h

prev 3.8d

TTR p50

3.9d

prev 0.1h

PR Review p50

WIP active

26

WIP blocked

17

AI insight

Where AI helps

No AI-owned metric is currently faster than the human cohort.

Where AI hurts

No AI-owned metric is currently slower than the human cohort.

AI cohort too small for direct comparison on this team.

Top AI bottleneck

no AI-owned cohort with stage data

Active agents · top 2

Nikolaos
36
Oliver
32

AI Period: compare · intro 2025-08-01

Active bottlenecks · top 5

Workflow stageRelative wait timeMedian time
Waiting for Client
139.8dp50
Ready For Canary
2.1dp50
In Progress
1.9dp50
On Hold
18.5hp50
Ready For Review
6.4hp50

Top teams · by throughput

KeyTeamThroughputLead Time (active)Cycle Time (active)Active WIPBlocked WIPAI %
ADSAdvertisement524.7d0h26170%
IMC[Engineering]: Incident Management229.6d200%

Data quality amber

Sync freshness2/2 synced
Latest sync2/2 OK
Config coverage1 status gap(s)
PR linkage1 projects ≥60%

Report version: engineering-flow.v8 · metric definitions: 2026-05-24.audit18.v1

Period: 2026-08-202026-09-19 · scope: AI teams (2 projects)

Detail view (/overview) → — full per-metric tables, AI Period comparison, longest-stuck list.

19 tickets excluded — managed centrally.